[Discuss] Future-proofing a house for networking -- what to run?
Bill Horne
bill at horne.net
Wed Sep 13 13:48:22 EDT 2017
On 9/12/2017 11:42 AM, Richard Pieri wrote:
> On 9/12/2017 10:52 AM, Derek Atkins wrote:
>> I am sorry, but I completely disagree. Even with modern Wifi, I can get
>> much better throughput using physical wires if for no other reason than
>> each link can be switched and therefore isn't "shared". With Wifi,
>> every device is sharing the medium. I.e., I can get 20-30Gbps aggregate
>> across my 1Gbps physical network, versus maybe 1.2Gbps across my 1200AC
>> Wifi. And let's not even start with interference from my neighbors!
> Wires aren't forever. They fail. They're supplanted by new standards.
> They're not even available on the most common devices today. Running
> wires is not future-proofing. It's future-obsolescence.
Although _/some/_ edge devices, such as streaming video adapters or
printers, are made for only WiFi connectivity, there are always other
models which include Ethernet and/or USB connections, either with or
without WiFi. "Future Proofing" includes avoiding future purchases, so I
always recommend that edge devices have more than one method of LAN
connection available.
WiFi-only devices will require that the owner keep updating his
equipment every time his ISP adopts a new WiFi standard. I feel that the
better plan is to start at the highest speed currently available
(fiber), and also include older technologies such as coax or Cat 5/6 to
serve legacy devices.
FWIW. YMMV.
Bill Horne
More information about the Discuss
mailing list