[Discuss] RMS
Rich Pieri
richard.pieri at gmail.com
Mon Sep 23 14:02:19 EDT 2019
On Mon, 23 Sep 2019 11:56:48 -0500
Derek Martin <invalid at pizzashack.org> wrote:
> So I lied, I do see a way: If you choose to read in the worst
> possible unstated intentions of the person making the statements.
> This is unfortunately a tactic that has become commonplace in recent
> years. Then you get the interpretation that you have taken.
Or the way that you seem to be directly avoiding: confusion. RMS wrote
two things which appear contradictory:
Epstein was a serial rapist.
Sexual assault presumes the application of force or violence.
Huh? So if Minsky or Epstein did not apply force or violence then it
wasn't sexual asasult or rape?
--
Rich Pieri
More information about the Discuss
mailing list