[Discuss] CrowdStrike

[Jason Normand]

>
> Probably they had a really complicated test that was supposed to catch
> this, but really complicated tests are themselves buggy. Who tested that
> the test catches the failures it is supposed to test? Not the
> non-existent QA department…
>
>
> -kb
>

It's hilarious because this is literally their excuse, their statement:

"Due to a bug in the Content Validator, one of the two Template
Instances passed validation despite containing problematic content
data,"

(https://www.cnbc.com/2024/07/24/crowdstrike-says-bug-in-quality-control-process-led-to-botched-update.html)