[Discuss] Debian Updates for aarch64 Lag?

[Kent Borg]

On 5/25/26 5:26 PM, Rich Pieri wrote:
> No. This isn't how Debian works. Quantity and quality of bug reports
> doesn't affect build system scheduling.

When the Copy Fail bug (a short Python program to a `#` root prompt) hit 
the scene on April 29 I got a new kernel for x86_64 on May 1, but I 
didn't get a new aarch_64 kernel until May 13.

But the numbers of bugs don't matter? aarch_64 has always been 
significantly lagging and I just haven't noticed?

I can imagine the build system is automated, but doesn't triaging and 
testing patches that make it into the build involve humans? The Linux 
kernel is very impressive for being written almost entirely in C, yet 
run on different CPUs. But within limits, they periodically drop targets 
for a reason, it is work to support different CPUs. An aarch_64 kernel 
is much more different from an x86_64 kernel than is a user land program 
compiled for the two architectures. Isn't it? Aren't humans involved? 
Aren't these same humans dealing with other patches? Aren't they a lot 
busier than they were a couple months ago??


-kb