30% Apple

[Jerry Feldman]

On 02/17/2011 10:59 PM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> There is something fundamentally different.  When you buy an iphone, yo=
u
> make a substantial investment, and you're required to sign a 2-year
> contract.  So when Apple suddenly starts a new policy of charging where=
 they
> previously weren't...  That's exploiting a monopoly.
>
Let's clear something up:
1. When you buy an iPhone you either pay the full amount (with most
going to Apple) or a discounted amount subsidized by the carrier (AT&T,
Verizon).
2. The 2-year contract is with your carrier, not with Apple.

Apple is certainly not exploiting a monopoly. Certainly their
subscription service does appear to be a monopolistic practice. Apple is
not a monopoly as there is a lot of competition out there. We'll have to
see how this plays out. I personally prefer Android based phones at the
moment, and in the future, Android or Linux based tablets. Right now,
IMHO, the Android tablets are not as good as the iPads are.

--=20
Jerry Feldman <gaf-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org>
Boston Linux and Unix
PGP key id: 537C5846
PGP Key fingerprint: 3D1B 8377 A3C0 A5F2 ECBB  CA3B 4607 4319 537C 5846



_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss-mNDKBlG2WHs at public.gmane.org
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss