[Discuss] RMS

[Rich Pieri]

On Mon, 23 Sep 2019 11:56:48 -0500
Derek Martin <invalid at pizzashack.org> wrote:

> So I lied, I do see a way:  If you choose to read in the worst
> possible unstated intentions of the person making the statements.
> This is unfortunately a tactic that has become commonplace in recent
> years.  Then you get the interpretation that you have taken.

Or the way that you seem to be directly avoiding: confusion. RMS wrote
two things which appear contradictory:

Epstein was a serial rapist.

Sexual assault presumes the application of force or violence.

Huh? So if Minsky or Epstein did not apply force or violence then it
wasn't sexual asasult or rape?

-- 
Rich Pieri