Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
I've made a couple of changes to the list configuration for this list, discuss at blu.org. + Administrivia turned off: This option is intended to intercept subscribe and unsubscribe requests that are mistakenly sent to the list, but in practice I find that it intercepts far too many legitimate messages, so I've turned it off. + Reply_to removed: When I first set up these lists four years ago, I set the reply_to option so replies get sent to the list, which seemed like the right way to do things. However, while reading through the Majordomo FAQ in preparation for upgrading the BLU server, I ran across a detailed examination of reply_to and mailing lists which led me to reconsider. If you're curious, the details can be found at http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html -- John Abreau / Executive Director, Boston Linux & Unix Email: jabr at blu.org / URL: http://www.blu.org ICQ#28611923 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Your mouse has moved. Windows NT must be restarted for the change to take effect. Reboot now? [ OK ] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- *** Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |