Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
> Answers from the linux/sparc mailing lists seem to indicate that the IPC > is capable of performing this function. But I would still like to run > some benchmarks. What tools/techniques can anyone recommend for generating > meaningful numbers so I can see exactly what the IPC is capable of... I think both top or xosview would do a fine job of monitoring what you're looking for (cpu, memory, swap). If you want a more high quality benchmarking test, you could always search freshmeat.net. As for my opinion on the IPC, I think you might be better off finding a low-end 486 to do the same job, though neither might handle the full DSL speed incredibly well. I ditched my IPC in favor of an IPX w/ 64MB memory and a sparc powerip chip that brings it to approximately SPARC 10 speed, which is currently masquerading the network on my friend's DSL line. It only runs minimal things besides performing masquerading (bind, samba, doesn't load X at startup) and I've found that when the full bandwidth is being employed, it gets almost fully bogged down. Just my $0.02. Brian Conway dogbert at clue4all.net - Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |