Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Sat, 4 Sep 1999, Brian Conway wrote: > I think both top or xosview would do a fine job of monitoring what you're > looking for (cpu, memory, swap). If you want a more high quality > benchmarking test, you could always search freshmeat.net. As for my > opinion on the IPC, I think you might be better off finding a low-end 486 > to do the same job, though neither might handle the full DSL speed > incredibly well. I ditched my IPC in favor of an IPX w/ 64MB memory and a The bus of either should handle the data just fine... CPU doesn't really enter into it unless you're doing a lot of complex filtering. I have a P75 doing filtering for my network at home, which never sees a load of over .02 unless I'm actually running something on it. As for how busy it is, I play quake through it so it will see thousands of packets per second for extended periods of time. -- Derek D. Martin | UNIX System Administrator derek at netria.com | dmartin at lancity.com - Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |