![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
I have been using Emacs for 15 years. Not only can you compile from within emacs, which I do nearly all the time. You can also debug. Debugging splits emacs into 2 windows with the source in one window and the debug command line in the other. Emacs has a compare mode where you can diff and merge. You can do email with emacs. I use macros extensively. For debugging, I found that ddd gives me a better way to graphically map my data. Scott Lanning wrote: > On Sun, 2 Jan 2000, Ron Peterson wrote: > >You can compile without leaving emacs. In emacs, type 'ESC-x compile' > > Yeah, definitely the compilation mode of emacs is pretty sweet. > When you compile, the errors pop into another buffer, and from > there you can go straight to the error in the source just like > using a hyperlink. In emacs, 'C-h i', go to 'emacs', > then search for 'compilation'. :) -- Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> Boston Linux and Unix user group http://www.blu.org - Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |