Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
I have doubts about this. I tried installing Linux on a spare 486 laptop Monday, an IBM ThinkPad 701CS. (These were the cool ones with the butterfly folding keyboards.) The problem was that I had no PCMCIA CD-ROM drive handy which had Linux support, so I had to boot DOS and copy files over from the CD to the hard drive and do the install sourced from the hard disk. I could not do a Red Hat install because it would have required 600 MB of hard disk space, basically copying the entire CD. I tried the SuSE install, which only needed about 130 MB, but it failed -- after taking nearly 20 minutes to load the initial boot disk. Finally, I ended up installing Debian and it worked just taking all of the defaults. -- Mike On Sun, 26 Mar 2000, Jerry Feldman wrote: > Interesting. I found in the installfests that SuSE seems to install more > reliably than Red Hat these days. I have not personally done a Mandrake > install, but Mandrake 7 is supposed to be solid also. - Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |