Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
> I was wondering if anyone at BLU could make some recommendations for Unix > development tools - compiler, linker, debugger, integrated text editor, etc. > GSI is using __very__ old versions gcc and gdb, and needs to upgrade for > better productivity. Are there are consultants at BLU would could make > recommendations, or be available to do onsite analysis of the situation? I think it's worth pointing out that one of the key benefits to free software solutions in this arena is the uniformity of the development environment across different versions of unix/linux/etc.... While it is possible that proprietary tools may be more efficient on particular platforms (e.g., aCC might produce more efficient code than gcc on an HP-UX box, depending on what you're doing), you will end up having fits when you try to use similar (but not identical) tools on other platforms. The savings in having your compiler, debugger, etc. all work the same way with the same features/options/bugs and the same interface everywhere is considerable. This is especially true for tools which are non-standardized or recently standardized (e.g., C++ compilers -- none of them meet the ansi standard completely, and they all fail in different ways). Of course, there are some products for which there are no free versions at present (e.g., Purify)... :-( Dan Katz - Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |