BLU Discuss list archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

CIFS (or equiv.) and security

Subject: CIFS (or equiv.) and security
From: gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 16:24:48 -0400
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10005181507190.2677-100000@martin.mclinux.com>
References: <392431C8.7B955414@yellowbank.com>

Regarding the protocol formerly known as SMB...
In a small home network with mixed Windoz and Linux systems, does it 
make sense to use both NFS and Samba, using NFS to mount Linux 
directories and SMB to mount shares from Windows machines. 
Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org>
Associate Director
Boston Linux and Unix user group
http://www.blu.org
-
Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the
message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).

Follow-Ups:
- CIFS (or equiv.) and security
  - From: mikebw at colossus.bilow.com (Mike Bilow)

References:
- CIFS (or equiv.) and security
  - From: rpeterson at yellowbank.com (Ron Peterson)
- CIFS (or equiv.) and security
  - From: ddm at mclinux.com (Derek Martin)

Prev by Date: CIFS (or equiv.) and security
Next by Date: Plea for help: The detriment of using Microsoft products
Previous by thread: CIFS (or equiv.) and security
Next by thread: CIFS (or equiv.) and security
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread


BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org