BLU Discuss list archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

CIFS (or equiv.) and security

Subject: CIFS (or equiv.) and security
From: mikebw at colossus.bilow.com (Mike Bilow)
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 17:15:37 -0400 (EDT)
In-reply-to: <39241950.9916.49C732CF@localhost>

Yes, because Windows clients do not understand NFS and Samba necessarily
obliterates Unixisms such as file modes.

-- Mike

On 2000-05-18 at 16:24 -0400, Jerry Feldman wrote:

> Regarding the protocol formerly known as SMB...
> In a small home network with mixed Windoz and Linux systems, does it 
> make sense to use both NFS and Samba, using NFS to mount Linux 
> directories and SMB to mount shares from Windows machines. 

-
Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the
message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).

Follow-Ups:
- CIFS (or equiv.) and security
  - From: rpeterson at yellowbank.com (Ron Peterson)
- CIFS (or equiv.) and security
  - From: niall at kst.com (Niall Kavanagh)

References:
- CIFS (or equiv.) and security
  - From: gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)

Prev by Date: xfs startup?
Next by Date: CIFS (or equiv.) and security
Previous by thread: CIFS (or equiv.) and security
Next by thread: CIFS (or equiv.) and security
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread


BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org