Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Christoph Doerbeck A242369 writes: > Hey folks, > > I am at a cross roads in the development of a little application. > What's better in the interest of performance and (more importantly) code > maintainability? > > a) use multiple simple SQL queries requiring additional code > b) increase SQL complexibilty, use one query and reduce code size > > Comments? Obviously it's tough to gauge the best solution without knowing > my design in detail, but I was wondering if there were some hacker > standards I should go by... Hackers and SQL? Oh well. If you're using an industrial strength database like Oracle or DB/2 I'd be inclined to hand it to the database and let the query optimizer sort it out. Warning: I'm only qualified to play a db programmer on TV. ccb -- Charles C. Bennett, Jr. VA Linux Systems Systems Engineer, 25 Burlington Mall Rd., Suite 300 US Northeast Region Burlington, MA 01803-4145 +1 617 543-6513 +1 888-LINUX-4U ccb at valinux.com www.valinux.com - Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |