Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Niall Kavanagh wrote: > > On Tue, 15 Aug 2000, Derek Martin wrote: > > > > > PosgreSQL apparently outperformed MySQL, Interbase, and two "leading > > proprietary DBMS" solutions in benchmark tests. See: > > > > http://apachetoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2000-08-14-008-01-PR-MR-SW > > > > <sigh> I wondered how long it would be before this popped up on the list. > > ODBC. They used ODBC drivers for everything. PostgreSQL has better ODBC > drivers. Much as I like PostgreSQL, I agree with Niall that this information is pretty useless. If you are concerned about db performance via odbc, ok. But when performance is truly critical, you don't use odbc. "Performance comparison" seems like a misnomer to me... -- Ron Peterson Systems Manager Wallace Floyd Design Group 273 Summer Street Boston, MA 02210 617.350.7400 tel 617.350.0051 fax rpeterson at wallacefloyd.com - Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |