Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Fri, 2 Nov 2001, John Tsangaris wrote: > >true. To non-programmers, it will always be obvious that programming > >languages can't be expressive, and there's nothing you could possibly > >do to convince them otherwise. > > > But that's the same as saying because you don't speak spanish, it isn't > expressive. Of > course you can't express anything in a language you do not speak. > > The only difference between spanish and perl is that there are enough > people physically > speaking spanish to make a huge uproar if the government said "spanish is > not a recognized > language, and is not covered under free speech". Who speaks perl? Of the > 5 geeks (I would > like to be one of them. :-) ) that probably speak full time perl in the > US, how many of those are > going to solicit understanding from politicians, and if 100% of them make > noise.. who's going > to hear 5 out of 275,000,000? > > If there was a large enough group of people able to communicate solely via > perl (many people > speak spanish AND english) and still get a concept across, then politicians > would be forced to > accept it as expressive. > Just a little background on me, here - I'm one of those unix/programming professionals who got into the unix/programming field as part of a desperate attempt to get away from graduate work. And, for me, the graduate work I got away from was linguistics. So, IMHO, if a group of people started using a programming language to communicate (only in written form, presumably - I'd hate to have to pronounce perl), and they really made it work, that would be amazing. I'm sure it would blow a lot of people's minds, that a synthetic, "machine" language could be used expressively, in exactly the same context as natural language. I think it would also be interesting, because of the evolutionary pressures that using code communicatively would put on the language design. That might be the way to evolve a real natural language interface for computers. I don't know, I'm rambling. But if you're trying to amass a user/speaker population, count me in. David
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |