Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Why FAT16 though. I would think that if one of the OSs were the original Windows95 or earlier, then FAT16 would be necessary. But, FAT32 has been used since Windows95 OSR1. BTW: Tools like Partition Magic can convert NTFS to FAT32 and ViceVersa. I would recommend that all NT based systems use NTFS for most of their stuff though. On 22 Apr 2002 at 14:17, Matthew J. Brodeur wrote: > Ditto. If I were doing another tri-boot I'd have a large FAT32 > partition separate from the three OS partitions. If you're still using NT > (ugh) you'd have to stick w/ FAT16 for the shared space, though. > I have heard of drivers for Windows to access ext2, but I don't know > that they're any more stable than the Linux NTFS driver. -- Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> Associate Director Boston Linux and Unix user group http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9 PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |