![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
I am not sure that NT can read the Fat32 partitions, does anyone know? > -----Original Message----- > From: Jerry Feldman [mailto:gaf at blu.org] > Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 2:58 PM > To: BLU Discuss List > Subject: RE: Some installfest issues > > > Why FAT16 though. I would think that if one of the OSs were > the original > Windows95 or earlier, then FAT16 would be necessary. But, > FAT32 has been > used since Windows95 OSR1. > BTW: Tools like Partition Magic can convert NTFS to FAT32 and > ViceVersa. > I would recommend that all NT based systems use NTFS for most > of their > stuff though. > On 22 Apr 2002 at 14:17, Matthew J. Brodeur wrote: > > Ditto. If I were doing another tri-boot I'd have a large FAT32 > > partition separate from the three OS partitions. If you're > still using NT > > (ugh) you'd have to stick w/ FAT16 for the shared space, though. > > I have heard of drivers for Windows to access ext2, but > I don't know > > that they're any more stable than the Linux NTFS driver. > > -- > Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> > Associate Director > Boston Linux and Unix user group > http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9 > PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9 > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at blu.org > http://www.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |