BLU Discuss list archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Linux vs FreeBSD, and other *NIXes

Subject: Linux vs FreeBSD, and other *NIXes
From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 14:27:19 -0400
In-reply-to: <20020624041404.B1421@eecs.tufts.edu>; from andy+blu@utter.net on Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 04:14:04AM -0400
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0206220117480.21736-100000@kramer.thekramers.net> <200206221224.g5MCOwC18108@gaf.blu.org> <20020624041404.B1421@eecs.tufts.edu>

On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 04:14:04AM -0400, Andy Davidoff wrote:
> I think the file-system scaling issues are more damning, frankly.

The 136 GB barrier?  (Isn't there a fix for the roll-your-own types?)

-kb, the Kent who likes ext3 on top of RAID 1.

References:
- Linux vs FreeBSD, and other *NIXes
  - From: david at thekramers.net (David Kramer)
- Linux vs FreeBSD, and other *NIXes
  - From: gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)
- Linux vs FreeBSD, and other *NIXes
  - From: andy+blu at utter.net (Andy Davidoff)

Prev by Date: FYI: UnitedLinux "certified binaries" will not to be freely available
Next by Date: Linux vs FreeBSD, and other *NIXes
Previous by thread: Linux vs FreeBSD, and other *NIXes
Next by thread: Linux vs FreeBSD, and other *NIXes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread


BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org