Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
At 03:14 PM 11/7/02 -0500, David Kramer wrote: >I'm currently working on a scheme to use my X10 automation stuff to turn >on an >external drive before a backup, and turn it off afterwards. That would >provide much greater protection. It definitely has a great coolness factor. :-) >The larger problem is that the USB port is USB 1.1, so it is incredibly >slow. >Firewire would be best. External SCSI wouldn't be bad, but there's less >isolation there than with a serial protocol. Might be worth it anyway for >the extra speed. How well is Firewire supported under Linux? Many mac folks have an external firewire drive and swear by them. The speed is excellent at 400mb/sec. (Is that mega bits or bytes anyway?) And unlike USB 2.0, you can actually get close to the theoretical limit with firewire. From what I have read, USB just has too much protocol overhead. Drew -- Drew Taylor | Web development & consulting http://www.drewtaylor.com/ | perl/mod_perl/DBI/mysql/postgres ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "If you don't know what your program is supposed to do, you'd better not start writing it." -Edsger Dijkstra ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Speakeasy.net DSL - http://www.speakeasy.net/refer/29655
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |