Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Friday 10 January 2003 03:20 pm, Nathan Meyers wrote: > Has DMCA really ventured into protection of network protocols? I > haven't heard those initials uttered in the ongoing Microsoft/AOL IM > interoperability pissing contest. Are you KIDDING!?!?! I just heard a case where Lexmark (the IBM printer spinoff) is pressing charges against a company who is refilling their laser toner cartridges because they reverse-engineered the smart chip Lexmark put in the card specifically to prevent refilling. The DMCA is nigh boundless, the way it is written. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- DDDD David Kramer david at thekramers.net http://thekramers.net DK KD DKK D You don't usually hear "hydraulics" and "simplicity" DK KD in the same sentence. DDDD Cathy Rogers, Junkyard Wars
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |