Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 12:22:04PM -0800, Hugh Rutledge wrote: > I'm getting a recommendation that our next incarnation > or remote email/web server run slackware rather than > redhat. The recommendation is based on slackware > being less popular therefore less attractive for > hackers but being as advanced as redhat in all the > areas that a remote apache server needs. Are there > any areas in which you feel slackware suffers in > comparison to redhat as a remote server os? Do hackers care about choice of distros? You're running the same web and email server software with the same security holes on either distro - RH has a nice system for distributing security patches, does Slackware? Nathan Meyers nmeyers at javalinux.net
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |