Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
I would say the biggest factor to consider is what you are comfortable supporting. If you are a RedHat shop then running a RedHat server would make sense from an administration/automation point of view. --Tim -----Original Message----- From: discuss-admin at blu.org [mailto:discuss-admin at blu.org] On Behalf Of Hugh Rutledge Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 15:22 To: discuss at blu.org Subject: philosophical issue: slackware vrs redhat I'm getting a recommendation that our next incarnation or remote email/web server run slackware rather than redhat. The recommendation is based on slackware being less popular therefore less attractive for hackers but being as advanced as redhat in all the areas that a remote apache server needs. Are there any areas in which you feel slackware suffers in comparison to redhat as a remote server os? Hugh __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss at blu.org http://www.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |