Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
> > Why so many servers? > > Last meeting the IBM guys presented VMware ESX which can reduce the > > number of physical servers. There is certainly some pros regarding > > multiple physical servers, but they presented a pretty good argument > > toward using VMware such that you have multiple virtual servers. I would > > still go for multiple physical boxes for redundancy. > > Redundancy and distribution of resources (CPU power, data lookup, etc). If those are your primary concerns, then I think I'd look into something like penguincomputing.com for some nice 1U servers. I've used them for a compute cluster using LSF and they worked just fine. The only reason I think that I would consider blades would be space restrictions. An IBM bladecenter works out to 1/2U and alot more money for less computing power per server. Grant M.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |