Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Sorry to hear that the linksys didn't work. I've heard alot of complaints from friends about theirs, but mine runs fine, I'm very happy with it. I want to replace it though, with something from snapgear.com, probably their LITE+, a little more expensive than a linksys or d-link, but its running linux and you can ssh into it and administer it =). Maybe the lameserver errors are occuring because of the odd system time values. -miah On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 08:31:35AM -0500, Rich Braun wrote: > After years of running Linux as my firewall (reasonably happily, aside > from an occasional crash caused by a defective tape drive), I decided > to buy one of those cheapo firewall boxes. Candidates were the > Linksys BEFSX41 and the D-Link DI-604 (as per the current PC Magazine > reviews). The Linksys went back to Microcenter yesterday, after about > 3 hours of service--it wouldn't stay up for more than an hour at a > time, before going into a repeated software-reboot cycle. > > Bring on the D-Link. It costs less and runs solid but I have an issue > similar to one raised by someone last October (google for 'named > di-604' in newsgroups). My caching DNS server gets a whole lot of > lame-server errors and timeouts when I set it up behind this NAT box. > There isn't enough debugging capability in the router for me to figure > this one out. I'm running 2.18 firmware, which has one other odd bug: > its system time reports wild values, whether NTP is turned on or not. > > The DNS errors did not happen with the Linksys, so I'm pretty sure > it's not a problem in the Linux config. > > Has anyone experimented with these broadband-router firewall boxes? > > Oh, and lest anyone else get suckered in by Linksys' marketing hype: their > firewall firmware is available ONLY in the BEFSX41 unit. Packaging for > various other products hints that it's included but it isn't. > > -rich > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at blu.org > http://www.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |