Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Seriously, I really wonder who is responsible for the spam protection at AOL. It seems they haven't done any real research or reading about the spam problem. Because people I know that have AOL still get loads and loads of spam. -miah On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 12:00:19PM -0400, Derek Martin wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 08:13:42AM -0700, miah wrote: > > [message rearranged to make quoting make sense] > > > On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 11:10:05AM -0400, Grant Young wrote: > > > AOL (and other ISPs) are getting pretty picky about where they accept > > > mail from to avoid as much spam as possible. > > > > whats sad is that its not helping. > > Anyone who thought it would is deluding themselves. For a substantial > period of time, before settling on my current spam solution, I > monitored where every piece of spam I received came from, in part to > get the hosts listed on an RBL (which I no longer think is an > acceptable course of action), and in part to understand where the spam > I was receiving was coming from. > > Only a small percentage of it was from a residential broadband IP in > North America. > > Most of the spam was from overseas, and much of that was from open > relays operated by commercial sites (or perhaps intentionally > originating from those commercial sites). Much of it was also from > sites whose origin was difficult to determine, other than to say it > was somewhere in Asia. > > The point is, spamming is profitable. So long as there are a > multitude of options for those who want to spam people, measures like > this one, while well-intentioned, will only serve to irritate some > segment of the legitimate user community who are not content to use > the Internet as they would a TV, but will do very little to prevent > spam. Real spammers will not be hindered by such measures, and will > simply use one of the other many alternative means of delivering their > spam to you. > > - -- > Derek D. Martin > http://www.pizzashack.org/ > GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQE/IAKTHEnASN++rQIRAvdfAJ4tdwGNdfpcRnpwqvIUtufpF1eM4QCfbxDf > TAGnJux4xqIK0ZUNemlxyzI= > =3wUY > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at blu.org > http://www.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |