Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 09:57, Rich Braun wrote: > As an example, I see a *lot* of html mail getting posted to one of my favorite > techie lists (nanog), one where I would've expected peer pressure would have > excluded such items. (You don't see those very often here on BLU, because > such submitters get shouted down quickly.) The list software can't parse > them, so you get all these =20, =3D, and html tags. When I receive an html message myself, I habitually delete it on the assumption that it's spam. As for the mailing lists, they're configured to only allow subscribers to post. Non-subscribers' messages get queued for administrative review, and those messages almost always turn out to be spam. Occasionally something legitimate gets caught, for instance when somebody subscribed with an "attbi.com" address posts from a "comcast.com" address, and I'd generally pass those along if I don't remember seeing them already re-posted by the author. However, when I review these messages, the first thing I notice is if they're plain-text or html. Anything that's html I delete with no further analysis. -- John Abreau / jabr at abreau.net / http://www.abreau.net (PGP) D5C7B5D9 / (FP) 72 FB 39 4F 3C 3B D6 5B E0 C8 5A 6E F1 2C BE 99 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20030729/ef193e0f/attachment.sig>
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |