Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Wizard wrote: > A company that I do work for, in an effort to protect itself from it's own > lusers, is considering parsing emails so that any external HREFs inside the > email point to http://localhost. They are also going to parse out all > attachments to a central intranet location, where they will be reviewed by > admins for legitimacy before being forwarded to the addressee. Can anyone > see any problems with this strategy? Somebody needs to do a rational analysis of what this proposal costs, based, for starters, on the number of attachments that would be removed and reviewed. What attachments would be rejected as not legitimate? Just viruses and worms? If so, then software scanning of incoming and outgoing e-mail is probably more economical. What kind of service level would be intended, for the hours of the manual review-service and its turnaround time? A large technical company would probably have people using e-mail 24 hours a day. Manual review of all attachments could be a burdensome workload, and I can't imagine that working for long. What's the attitude about people sending or receiving personal e-mail? A lot will be blocked by a program that strips out attachments. Will staff figure the company is taking a draconian approach and that they're being monitored very closely? --RC
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |