Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> wrote on Friday: > > I gave the source to the abuse address at ipermitmail.com. > No. I think the problem has been corrected. Jerry-- The ipermitmail offender is still on the BLU list. Any BLU submitters who aren't yet on ipermitmail's whitelist are still getting those annoying challenge-response messages. Other than blackholing ipermitmail's mx receivers from the BLU server, I don't have any ideas on how to stamp this problem out. (Obviously whoever's using ipermitmail is not getting BLU postings anymore, so he/she remains oblivious to our complaints, or if they are aware, they have chosen not to discontinue using ipermitmail for the BLU subscription.) Perhaps BLU should post a policy on the mailing-list page asking that new subscribers double-check their email address to make sure it does not have challenge-response spam checking software enabled. I suppose another idea would be to write a script that extracts the domain portion of each of the current BLU subscribers and does a 'dig' for the MX records. The output could then be grep'ed for ipermitmail.com or ilap.com to hopefully find the offending address. -rich
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |