Rebuilding

[mattg at theworld.com (matt galster)]

I'd probably pick SuSE over debian.  The future of an alpha version of SuSE
is questionable though.  I'd rather not go with a version that will be
unsupported soon like RH on alpha is now.

MEG

> -----Original Message-----
> From: discuss-admin at blu.org [mailto:discuss-admin at blu.org]On Behalf Of
> Jerry Feldman
> Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 9:24 AM
> To: BLU Discussion List
> Subject: Re: Rebuilding
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sat, 20 Sep 2003 23:02:16 -0400
> "matt galster" <mattg at theworld.com> wrote:
>
> > I'd noticed that the SuSE version was put up without support because
> > SuSE people wanted one for themselves.  I guess that
> settles SuSE.  I
> > guess now I'll need to decide about gentoo as well.  Anyone have a
> > feel for the maturity of that dist?  It isn't like RH or SuSE with a
> > pedigree, AFAIK.
> SuSE was the distribution of choice inside of Compaq (at least by the
> engineers).
>
>
> - --
> Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org>
> Boston Linux and Unix user group
> http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9
> PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQE/baZc+wA+1cUGHqkRAsNRAJ9pgpQIz0d4Lf90ZtY8/JdLGAgMugCeNua2
> jqtejkMNO4PNq9bEqo4vi24=
> =70qN
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at blu.org
> http://www.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss