![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 10:09:05PM -0400, Thomas Leonard wrote: > Hey all, > > I'm a bit of a dabbler as far as OSes go, and I've installed my share > of Linux distros (Redhat, SuSE, Mandrake PPC, YDL, Debian, gentoo-ppc) > and I was sure to say this when I got to school and applied for my job > at ResNet/Campus IT. Come to find out I am the only other person who > really knows anything about Linux (and being that money is scarce free > is looking even better.) They told me today (my 3rd day on the job) > that they wanted me to install my favorite distro on a machine that was > to be a BIND "caching" server. The other guy who knows about Linux > said he wanted it chroot jail-ed and configurable by webmin if > possible. Being as how I am mostly a desktop user and have only had > server wise setting up and configuring apache, ssh, and mailman this > has me a bit nervous. I have decided to go with Debian (Woody, Sarge > or Sid I haven't decided but I'm obviously leaning towards Woody). Do > any battle hardened guru's have advice / pointers before I start? > Anything really would be greatly appreciated. It's a production server, therefore you go with stable. If you want a caching DNS server, it's extremely easy. bind and webmin-bind are apt-gettable. You need a named.conf: // a caching only nameserver config zone "." in { type hint; file "db.cache"; }; Then create a db.cache: dig @.aroot-servers.net . ns > db.cache And restart bind. djbdns and maradns are good alternatives to bind -- neither has the horrible security record of bind. -dsr-
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |