Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 08:33:30PM -0400, Anthony Gabrielson wrote: > > >Now, I'm all for a good healthy hatred for big brother, but do you > >really think this makes it easier or harder for them to read your mail? > >As if all your outbound traffic destined for tcp 25 doesn't all go > >through your default gateway of comcast. Relay to/from wherever you > >want, it's still going through comcast and outside of your control, > > > >Unless you're encrypting, and/or using stego, big brother ashcroft > >and his mcarthy style thought police are still putting you in their > >database. Whoops, I'm sending this using a comcast connection. > > > IMHO - your right on. Traffic is designed to bounce around, at some point > it needs to go through a big brother router. Oh, and by the way encryption > will do no good with big brother. There are tools available that decrypt > everything. I've been encrypting all my subversive mail in pig-latin - so far, it hasn't been broken. Nathan
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |