Routing all mail through comcast

[235u at comcast.net (eric)]

On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 20:33, Anthony Gabrielson wrote:
> >Now, I'm all for a good healthy hatred for big brother, but do you
> >really think this makes it easier or harder for them to read your mail?
> >As if all your outbound traffic destined for tcp 25 doesn't all go
> >through your default gateway of comcast. Relay to/from wherever you
> >want, it's still going through comcast and outside of your control,
> >
> >Unless you're encrypting, and/or using stego, big brother ashcroft
> >and his mcarthy style thought police are still putting you in their
> >database. Whoops, I'm sending this using a comcast connection.
> 
> 
> IMHO - your right on.  Traffic is designed to bounce around, at some point 
> it needs to go through a big brother router.  Oh, and by the way encryption 
> will do no good with big brother.  There are tools available that decrypt 
> everything.

i don't know about this.  "encryption will do no good with big
brother".  do you mean that uncle sam can crack my encryption or that he
will use another method to get the my key (key logger, informant, club
to head, ect.)?  if you mean that the possibility exists that he can
crack it (time, resources) then ok.  if you mean that an algorithm exist
that can crack my GPG like my nephew with a candy wrapper, i must ask,
how do you know?
-eric.
> 
> Have fun!
> Anthony
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at blu.org
> http://www.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
-- 
Check out http://home.comcast.net/~235u
"Loki_the_Doppelganger"

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20031023/06cef8ed/attachment.sig>