Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 05:53:43PM -0500, Derek Atkins wrote: > "Bill Horne" <bill at horne.net> writes: > > > I'm running a 100MHz 486 with 49MB of ram. It has a 40GB hard drive. > > Did you try a RH install? Or are you basing this completely on the > release notes? All their packages, AFAICT, are still compiled for > i386, including the kernel package. Like someone else on the list, I too have tried to install a recent release of Red Hat (RH8, I think) on an older machine. The packages may well be compiled for i386[1], but whether or not that's the case the install simply would not work, neither in text nor graphical mode. It doesn't much matter if the software theoretically works on the hardware if there's no practical way to get it installed... -=-=-=- [1] I heard somewhere that they are now compiled with pentium optimizations, even if they claim to be i386 packages. I can neither confirm nor refute that. -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0xDFBEAD02 -=-=-=-=- This message is posted from an invalid address. Replying to it will result in undeliverable mail. Sorry for the inconvenience. Thank the spammers. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20031028/2ea1ef81/attachment.sig>
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |