Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 06:58, Johannes Ullrich wrote: > Otherwise, I guess there is still SuSe. So what are > the 'major' distributions left? > > Suse, Mandrake, Debian? I'm looking for a little education here. It may come across as flame bait, I ask folks not to mistake my ignorance as such. 8) I hear a lot of folks (particularly on this list) who are enamored with Suse. However, to me it seems kind of like a pain. Here are the things that I "think" I know about it that turn me off from trying it. If any are wrong or could even just be looked at from a different viewpoint, I'd love to hear about it. 1) You can't get the latest version for free. If you want the latest greatest version, you must pay for it? 2) Updates are not free. Admittedly, Red Hat doesn't do updates for free either, but at least there is either apt for rpm, or you could use the red carpet tools. 3) Init scripts are BSD style rather than SysV. 4) Package management is lacking and the tool (yast, IIRC?) most used for pm is a little cryptic. If any or all of these are wrong, I'd love to hear about it. Heck, those who believe in Suse's superiority for other reasons are welcomed to evangelize. Thanks in advance. -- Those who live by the sword get shot by those who don't. Cole Tuininga Lead Developer Code Energy, Inc colet at code-energy.com PGP Key ID: 0x43E5755D
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |