BLU Discuss list archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

security through obscurity

Subject: security through obscurity
From: smallm at panix.com (Mike Small)
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 11:20:14 -0500
In-reply-to: <200402131556.KAA21435581@shell.TheWorld.com>
References: <sjmk72rauv0.fsf@dogbert.ihtfp.org> <200402131556.KAA21435581@shell.TheWorld.com>

On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 10:56:28AM -0500, geer at world.std.com wrote:
> 
> .  > http://www.microsoft.com/resources/sharedsource/licensing/getsource.mspx
> .  
> .  Heh.
> 
> I'm almost of a mind to consider the linguistic
> hair-splitting of "open source" (as in Linux)
> versus "opened source" (as in dropping Microsoft's
> drawers for Russia, Germany, France, ...)
> 
> --dan
 
Yet another example proving that "free software" is the superior term.
*ducks*

- Mike

References:
- security through obscurity
  - From: derek at ihtfp.com (Derek Atkins)
- security through obscurity
  - From: geer at world.std.com (geer at world.std.com)

Prev by Date: security through obscurity
Next by Date: Installfest has been /.'d
Previous by thread: security through obscurity
Next by thread: security through obscurity
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread


BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org