Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Tue, 2004-04-06 at 13:36, Brendan wrote: > I think you may have it reversed. SO is built from the OO source, not the > other way around. There are no true restrictions that Sun can put on OO, > except to withdraw resources from working on Open-source components (100% of > OO, and 99% of SO), and switch to a different license for modules that fit > into OO. Unfortunately, OpenOffice is still highly dependent on Sun for programming and support resources. Despite being widely used by the open soruce community and a key selling point for a lot of distributions, OpenOffice has not been able to attract much developer support for the guts of the application for whatever reasons. Given Sun's deteriorating business conditions, this dependence could be a setback for OO if the community does not become more involved and Sun has a change of heart. http://www.jroller.com/comments/sander/Weblog/sailing_calm_and_boring_waters A fear of mine has been that as open source becomes more popular, the mooch factor of thinking that 'somebody else will do it' becomes dangerously large. Somebody else will code, somebody else will pay, somebody else will document, etc. Like a crowd of people walking by somebody in need of help thinking that surely somebody else will do something as they walk by. Steve
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |