Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Thu, 2004-04-08 at 16:40, Jerry Feldman wrote: [snip] > I prefer installing Linux in an extended partition. This allows you to > allocate as many Linux partitions as you want. (I personally prefer > root, swap, home, and /usr/local file systems). Jerry, Since I've been recommending a single partition for "home" grade installations, please share the reasons for using this plan. > Another issue is that during install, you are given the option to > install the boot loader (GRUB or LILO). These install into the Master > Boot Record and can easily be configured to boot Windows. The Windows loader can also boot Linux: if you're using a corporate PC, that's sometimes required. Grub does at the start of the Linux partition, instead of the MBR. > If you think the MBR is damaged, you can boot Windows rescue diskette, run the fdisk > command with the /mbr option. I wonder if it'll boot into an active Linux partition: does it just take the active partition, or does it check the partition type? > The following Linux command will also clear the Master Boot Record: > dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda bs=512 count=1 I suggest the dd command be done from a rescue floppy disk _BEFORE_ installing Linux, to _SAVE_ the existing MBR: dd if=/dev/hd[a,b,c,d] of=/somefilename bs=512 count=1 (assumes IDE: hda is primary master, hdb primary slave, etc.) Bill
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |