Boston Linux & Unix (BLU) Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Folllow up to my Disk Druid Question, or "comedy of errors"



On 10 Apr 2004 10:51:43 -0400
Bill Horne <bill at billhorne.homelinux.org> wrote:

> Since I've been recommending a single partition for "home" grade
> installations, please share the reasons for using this plan.
I strongly recommend at least a separate /home and /usr/local/. The
reasons for this are:
1. When reinstalling or upgrading Linux your /home and /usr/local
directories will not be destroyed. Note that I recommend clean installs
rather than upgrade installs of any OS (Unix, Linux, Windows...).

2. Backing up. Although this really pertains to the Unix dump command
that works on a file system basis. 

Additionally, some people like to create a /boot file system. The reason
for a /boot is that you keep it normally unmounted so it is not subject
to some inadvertent corruption. I generally don't make a separate /boot.

Some people also prefer a separate /var. There are some good reasons for
this. The /var file system is very volatile since it contains logs an
spools. By separating it from the root file system, you add a tab more
protection against corruption of the root file system. Another advantage
is that it also limits problems that arise when some log or spool gets
too large due to normal use or possibly hacking. 

On my home system, I also have 2 root file systems, one for the current
version of the OS and another for the next version. once I install a new
version of Linux, the old version becomes a fallback. I also have some
partitions available for backing up my system and my wife's system every
night. 

-- 
Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org>
Boston Linux and Unix user group
http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9
PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.blu.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20040410/6a84392c/attachment.sig>



BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Valid HTML 4.01! Valid CSS!



Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org