Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
> It seems to me that the fact that a noob can survive two years with > Linux and still be a noob is a testament to how far along Linux has > come. Devil's Advocate: Is it better to have something that *appears* so easy to use that you have complete confidence in it immediately (Windows), or something that is so intimidating that after 2 years you still lack the confidence to think of yourself as anything but a newbie? Not debating whether people who think they are knowledgeable in something really are -- just in relative comfort/confidence levels. If somebody used Windows for 2 years and still called himself a noob, would it be a good thing? Duane
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |