Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Josh Pollak <pardsbane at offthehill.org> writes: | > It seems to me that the fact that a noob can survive two years with | > Linux and still be a noob is a testament to how far along Linux has | > come. | | Devil's Advocate: Is it better to have something that *appears* so easy to | use that you have complete confidence in it immediately (Windows), or | something that is so intimidating that after 2 years you still lack the | confidence to think of yourself as anything but a newbie? | | Not debating whether people who think they are knowledgeable in something | really are -- just in relative comfort/confidence levels. If somebody | used Windows for 2 years and still called himself a noob, would it be a | good thing? Well, I know a number of people who have used Windows since it came out, and freely admit that they don't really uderstand much of its workings at all. They are constantly baffled and frustrated by it. Their fear of unix/linux is that they know how difficult Windows is, and the marketing/media hype keep telling them that it's easy. If this atrocity is easy, they think, what must those other system be like? Add to this the general perception that anything different must be hard, and you have a recipe for absolutely refusing to even look at any alternatives. The fact that the unix crowd is generally honest about how difficult their system can be just adds to people's fears, since they can't distinguish honest discussions of difficulties from dishonest claims about ease of use. OTOH, I've also seen a number of Windows users (including my wife) who got their hands on a Mac, and within an hour were ready to junk their Windows box. I'd conclude that, to get more "market share", the linux crowd is making a big mistake in trying to emulate Windows. That will just give us a UI that is as awful as Windows. If we emulate the Mac, though, we stand a chance of getting the same "Wow, this is nice!" reaction that you see in so many first-time Mac users. Not that there aren't problems with the Mac UI, of course. Most of us with years of X-Windows experience can rattle off a long list of the Mac's UI deficiencies. But it's so much better (from a novice's viewpoint) than anything that MS produces, that it really stands out to users who can be persuaded to give it a try.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |