Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
--- mimiahjjjjohnsonunrise-lilinuxom> wrote: > advantage being if you get owned, you burn a new cdcd> and reboot. Since > its all a read-only fifilesystemhat loads into > memory anything an > attacker does is temporary. Forgive my ignorance as I've never used one of these, but why burn a new cdcdunless of course there's a new version) why not just use the same cdcdnd reinstall? What about updates? Do you have to take your router / firewall down and and reinstall each time there's an update? That would suck. If this is ununnecessarynd updates are stored on the hard drive, then why use a cdcdt all? mmmmmnnn. SmSmoothwalls such a breeze to use while still offering more sophisticated control, unless there's more reasons to go live cdcdI'll stick with what i got. So why does the original poster want a cdcd ===== D. Eric Chadbourne http://caffeinated.homelinux.net/ "Shadowman doesn't know what the heck you just said, but you moved him." - Shadowman. _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote.yahoo.com
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |