Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
right, there would have to be a new release in order for that to do anything, chances are, your your cd-based os is getting owned, its something there is probably a fix for already. And if not, I'd be bitching at smoothwall for not releasing a fix, but they seem to be pretty good about it. -miah On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 06:26:32AM -0700, Eric wrote: > --- mimiahjjjjohnsonunrise-lilinuxom> wrote: > > > advantage being if you get owned, you burn a new > cdcd> and reboot. Since > > its all a read-only fifilesystemhat loads into > > memory anything an > > attacker does is temporary. > > Forgive my ignorance as I've never used one of these, > but why burn a new cdcdunless of course there's a new > version) why not just use the same cdcdnd reinstall? > What about updates? Do you have to take your router / > firewall down and and reinstall each time there's an > update? That would suck. If this is ununnecessarynd > updates are stored on the hard drive, then why use a > cdcdt all? mmmmmnnn. SmSmoothwalls such a breeze to > use while still offering more sophisticated control, > unless there's more reasons to go live cdcdI'll stick > with what i got. So why does the original poster want > a cdcd > > ===== > D. Eric Chadbourne > http://caffeinated.homelinux.net/ > "Shadowman doesn't know what the heck > you just said, but you moved him." > - Shadowman. > > > > _______________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! > http://vote.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at blu.org > http://www.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |