Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
A good balance between free and supported would be to run RHEL on produciton and CentOS or Whitebox on development. Basically if you want support for production, you will have to pay for it. In development, use a distro that mirrors your production environment and with RedHat EL, you can get Whitebox and CentOS to do this exactly. Both are built from source rpms provided by RedHat. -dave On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 08:10:14 -0500, Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> wrote: > IMHO, when choosing a distro for corporate 24x7 servers, I would definitely > go with either Red Hat or SuSE. One issue we were having was with > scalability. Red Hat's Enterprise server uses the 2.4 kernel that does not > scale well above 4 processors. The 2.6 kernel does well up to 16. SuSE's > SLES 9 uses the 2.6 kernel. > > While one issue is suport for Linux itself from the Linux vendors, another > is support from the server manufacturer. I cannot speak for IBM, but HP > fully supports both SLES and RHEL on their 32-bit and 64-bit servers. > > -- > Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> > Boston Linux and Unix user group > http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9 > PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9 > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at blu.org > http://olduvai.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |