Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Thursday 03 February 2005 08:26, Dave Berry wrote: > A good balance between free and supported would be to run RHEL on > produciton and CentOS or Whitebox on development. Basically if you > want support for production, you will have to pay for it. In > development, use a distro that mirrors your production environment > and with RedHat EL, you can get Whitebox and CentOS to do this > exactly. Both are built from source rpms provided by RedHat. We had some discussion on Red Hat licensing at Usenix last year. I think that you can install the server software on more than the boxes that are licensed, but only one will be supported for up2date and support purposes. The licensing is not specifically on the software, but on the support. As I also mentioned before, neither RHEL nor SLES are really good for desktop workstations. In those cases, either Fedora, SuSE Professional (for developers), GENtoo, Debian, Novell desktop or Linspire for casual users. Additionally, while I prefer a boxed set, both Fedora media and SuSE media can be legally copied and spread throughout the enterprise. -- Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> Boston Linux and Unix user group http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9 PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |