Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 10:07:34AM -0400, Gordon Marx wrote: > * FreeBSD The most powerful x86 open source Unix > * OpenBSD The most secure open source Unix available > * NetBSD The most portable open source Unix available > * Linux The most popular open source Unix" Interesting list. > It seems to me that they'll at least support you bringing up some form > of Linux on the thing...whether it's your distro of choice or not is > anyone's guess. My guess is that if you send an e-mail saying you can't bring up Red Hat Linux, they will shake their heads, mutter something about your not understanding embedded software, and give you some version of the brushoff. If, however, you are actually doing embedded work, are booting a kernel, and some device isn't working right, they will mutter that they were suspicious there was a bug there, read your e-mail carefully hoping to learn something, and maybe help you out. But supporting embedded engineering is not a bounded project, unless you pay them lots of money there will be serious limits to the support you receive. There is a difference between embedded and user computing and usually the terms "distribution" and "embedded Linux" are oxymoronic to mix. Embedded means you are crafting what is on your box and no distribution (with the possible exception of something from, say, Montavista) can have already done that crafting for you. (Even Montavista is selling you a product that merely helps you with that very detailed customizing as opposed to installing all the stuff a general purpose distribution includes. Heck, Montavista maybe already supports these boards.) As embedded boards become more capable it is tempting to put a big, general purpose distribution on it, but beware of the bugs in the bits you aren't actively using, and beware of the maintenance problems from having so much software installed in your "appliance". -kb, the Kent who would rather his appliances include as much software as necessary and no more.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |