![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Matthew Gillen wrote: > The problem is with library versioning. You have a version of the jpeg > library installed, but there is a convention with the linker that there > should exist (for initial linking purposes) a .so version (with no > numbers). Redhat has taken the stance that since this symbolic link is > only needed for compilation, then it is part of the -devel package. So, > the right solution to your problem is to install the -devel package > corresponding to the package containing the libjpeg library. The > naughty thing you could do is just manually 'ln -s libjpeg.so.62 libjpeg.so' WooHoo! That's been driving me nuts for almost 2 hours now. Thanks! (I did the naughty thing ;-). -=Grant M.=-
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |