Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Quoting dsr at tao.merseine.nu: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 10:53:34AM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote: >> dsr at tao.merseine.nu writes: >> So something like this in /etc/sysconfig/iptables would do what I >> wanted? >> >> -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 22 -m state --state NEW -m recent --name ssh --set > > Adds the packet info to the ssh recent list Doesn't this also update the entry if it already exists? [!] --set -> This will add the source address of the packet to the list. If the source address is already in the list, this will update the existing entry. This will always return success or failure if `!' is passed in. >> -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 22 -m state --state NEW -m recent --name ssh >> --update --seconds 60 --hitcount 4 -j LOG --log-level WARN >> --log-prefix SSH-TOO-FAST > > This logs packets which have appeared 4 times in the last 60 secs Doesn't this need to be --rcheck as well, as the state would've been updated by the --set in the previous line? >> -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 22 -m state --state NEW -m recent --name ssh >> --update --seconds 60 --hitcount 4 -j REJECT --reject-with >> icmp-host-prohibited > > This should be --rcheck instead of --update, as the packet count > does not need to be updated. Okay, I thought so on this one... >> Question: is there some way to have a rule that if one 'recent' >> check passed then I can set another one? E.g., I'd like to be able >> to do something like: >> >> if packet matches XX, set badguy >> if packet matches YY, set badguy if YY-hitcount >= 4 >> if packet matches ZZ, set badguy if ZZ-hitcount >= 6 >> if badguy, drop >> >> I just don't know if you can have multiple "recent name" settings like >> this? > > I think I understand what you want -- anyone who is on any of > the idiot lists, drop all packets from them -- but I don't think > you can do it this way. True, but I think I can do it with various chains.. If I have a chain for each type of miscreant then a global "kill them"... > -dsr- Thanks! -derek -- Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB) URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH warlord at MIT.EDU PGP key available
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |