![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Wednesday 02 November 2005 2:00 pm, Bob BLU wrote: > At 01:09 PM 11/2/2005, Jerry Feldman wrote: > >AAMD 64-bit chips are faster ... > > > >HP laptop model numbers that are certified for Linux. > > What exists at the intersection of these two statements? > > > Separately, I've been eyeing the ASUS Z71V for a potential Linux > notebook: > > http://usa.asus.com/products4.aspx?l1=5&l2=70&l3=0&model=609&modelmenu=1 Does it actually contain both?? -Intel? Pentium? M Processor with 2MB on-die cache -Mobile Intel Celeron M Processor with 512K/1MB on Die L2 Cache As I mentioned, the AMD 64-bit processors are faster than the Intel processors and both Intel and AMD will not be manufacturing pure 32-bit chips in the near future. In any case, make sure that the laptop is Linux compatible. I don't see that listed on Linux for laptops. I was just looking at the HP notebooks that Linux is certified on, and a number of them are certified by Red Hat and SuSE, mostly HP/Compaq N series (eg. nx8220). One thing I can say is that both IBM and HP have a Linux commitment, but neither Dell nor Gateway do. Remember that for the retail platforms, their agreements with Microsoft prevent them from supplying preinstalled Linux. This is not true for business laptops, desktops and servers. -- Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> Boston Linux and Unix user group http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9 PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |